Patterns of Maternal Behaviour in Sheep

Authors

  • Ioan Țibru Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romania
  • Maria Sauer Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romania
  • Ana Gina Armas Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romani
  • Daniela Valusescu Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romania
  • Ioan Negrea Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romani
  • Mihaela Florentina Albulescu Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romani
  • Ioan Walter Sauer Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine ”King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 300645, Calea Aradului, No. 119, Timisoara, Romania

Keywords:

ethology, grooming behaviour, maternal behaviour, sheep, welfare

Abstract

The mother-offspring behaviour patterns were monitored in 10 ewes and their new-born lamb(s), during one month,
between 1015 am and 1915 pm. Inside the shelter, the temperature ranged between 9 and 20°C and outside, there was
sunny weather, with mild wind blow. The observations were made from 10 m distance, without breaking into the
sheep’s flight zone. There were observed 2130 patterns of ewe-lamb interaction, belonging to 22 main manifestations
of maternal behaviour. The most frequently observed behaviour in the ewes was lamb grooming (licking): licking the
head of the lamb was observed 356 times (41%), followed by licking the forequarter – 265 times (30%), the back of
the lamb – 131 times (15%), the abdominal area – 91 times (10%) and the perineal and/or anogenital area – 36 times
(4%). Studies of maternal and neonatal behaviour in sheep contribute to development of management practices,
resulting in decreased neonatal mortality, increased meat production and improvement of animal health and welfare.
They also confirm the importance of ethology in the veterinary practice.

References

Alexander, G., Peterson, J.E., Neonatal mortality in

lambs. Austr. Vet. J., 1961, 37, p, 371-381.

Athanasiadou, S., Houdijk, J., Kyriazakis, I.

Exploiting synergisms and interactions in the

nutritional approaches to parasite control in sheep

production systems. Small Ruminant Research, 2008,

, 1-2, 2-11,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.12.016

Avondo, M., Fasone, V., Pagano, I.R., Crescione, A.,

Galofaro, V., Effetto della percentuale di pascolo nella

dieta sul contenuto di acido linoleico coniugato (CLA)

nel latte ovino. in: Proc. Società Italiana di Patologia ed

Allevamento degli Ovini e dei Caprini (S.I.P.A.O.C),

Cagliari, Italy. (Abstr. in Italian); 2002, 134

Bareham, J.R., The behaviour of lambs on the first

day after birth. Br. Vet. J., 1976, 132, 152-161.

Binnsa, S.H., Coxb, I.J.. Rizvib, S. Greena, L.E Risk

factors for lamb mortality on UK sheep farms, 2002,

, 3–4, 22 January, 287–303

Bøe, K. E.. Ottosen A. M Andersen I.,L., Feed intake

and competition in ewes on ad libitum or semirestricted feeding of grass silage and hay. J Anim Sci,

, 90, 11, 4014-4019

Caroprese, M., Sheep housing and welfare, Small

Ruminant Research, 2008, 76, 21-25.

Houpt Katerine, Domestic animal behaviour for

veterinarias and animal scientists, Iowa State press,

Kendrick KM, Sheep senses, social cognition and

capacity for consciousness. In: Dwyer CM (ed) The

welfare of sheep, J Anim Sci, 2008, 6915008—5016

Kilgour, R.J., Waterhouse, T., Dwyer, C.M.,

Ivanov, I.D., Farming systems for sheep production and

their effect on welfare. In: The Welfare of Sheep (ed)

C.M. Dwyer. Springer Science, 2008, 213–265.

Napolitano F, Giuseppe De Rosa, Valentina

Ferrante, Fernando Grasso, Ada Braghieri, Monitoring

the welfare of sheep in organic and conventional farms

using an ANI 35L derived method. Small Ruminant

Research, 2009, 01/2009, 83, 49-57.

Dwyer CM, Bornett HLI, Chronic stress in sheep:

assessment tools and their use in different management

conditions. Animal Welfare, 2004, 13, 293-304

Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V.,Tosi, MV., Janczak, A.M., Visser, E.K. and Jones, R.B.,

Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed

species: A critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour

Science, 2006, 101, 185–242.

Sevi, A., Casamassima,D., Giuseppe Pulina, G.,

Pazzona, A., Factors of welfare reduction in dairy

sheep and goats. Italian Journal of Animal Science,

, 8 (Suppl. 1), 81

Wemelsfelder, F; Farish, M. Qualitative categories

for the interpretation of sheep welfare: a review.

Animal Welfare, 2004, 13, 3, 261-268(8)

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority),

Guidance on Risk Assessment for Animal Welfare

Article Print on demand EFSA Journal 2012, 10(1),

[30 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2513

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05